Would this be a draw?

Would this game ended in a draw by not enough material if I had taken the pawn?

If you capture the pawn , then checkmate can't be forced.
lichess.org/editor/7K/5k2/5nn1/8/8/8/8/8_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white Checkmate is possible , but it can't be forced.....

Actually, I'm reading this other post lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/king-and-two-knights-cant-mate-but-opponent-got-time-win
And it seems that the game would continue after taking the pawn, so I would have probably win by time as I did in the game

Why should it be a draw? Answer without using the word „forced“.

@Sarg0n said in #4:
> Why should it be a draw? Answer without using the word „forced“.

Who are you to determine how I should answer lol . For being a titled player you obviously don't know the FIDE rules...

Which rule is it that you know and I don’t?

The topic on whether games are a draw or a loss after one player’s time has run out isn’t really new.
In the position posted above it should still be a win for Black, as (for example) bKh3, Ne2 and Nf2 could checkmate the white king on h1.

Such a position can never be reached by force, but this is immaterial – it would be possible to reach such a position, therefore Black should still have won.

One point of interest is that if White's pawn had been back on g3 instead of on g5, the pawn securely blockaded by one of the knights, then Black would actually have been able to force mate although it might possibly have taken more than 50 moves to do so, meaning the 50-move rule might save White. The presence of a pawn behind the Troitsky line means that the defender's stalemate defence in the pure K+N+N vs K ending doesn't work.

[Variant "From Position"]
[FEN "8/8/6k1/4KnP1/8/8/4n3/8 w - - 17 64"]

64. Ke4 Kxg5 65. Kf3 Ne3 66. Kf2 Ng4+ 67. Kg2 Nc3 68. Kg1 Kh4 69. Kh1 Kh3 70. Kg1 Ne2+ 71. Kh1 Nf2#