Stockfish Analysis

I played white in a anonymous vs anonymous game called the "Barnes defense" It turned out to be a fool's mate. 1.e4 f6 2.d4 g5 3.Qh5# I had the game analyzed by stockfish and it showed... O-O-O for both players. I think 2....g5 was a blunder. I have been trying get a O-O-O game and when I finally do... the analysis is faulty. Oh and its abit of a jest on any joy for this O-O-O game. :]

Can anyone explain why stockfish would show a O-O-O computer score for both players, for what is fool's mate? The move black makes to allow the mate has to be a blunder,a mistake or at least an inaccuracy.

what do you mean by "O-O-O"?

isn't that just castling to the queen side?

In this context, it means the number of errors each side has made, 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, and 0 blunders

Computer game analysis that displays O-O-O meaning that one played with no inaccuracies no mistakes no blunders...the game and notation I played is in my original post. It was a fool's mate and no castling was involved

I am not sure why, but Stockfish doesn't show inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders in the opening 6-8 moves of the game. (No idea why though)

Maybe they have switched off comments in the early moves as Stockfish used to comment these first moves wrong, like 1 e4 g6? mistake.