As a conclusion we can see LM's are online specialists excelling in speed and online skill or variants. In that way they are worthy masters.
It's like comparing tigers with lions. They have different habitats.
Best way to compare a CM to LM is to compare their FIDE ratings (assuming the LM has one).
Best way to compare a CM to LM is to compare their FIDE ratings (assuming the LM has one).
@Kratos_chesss said in #29:
> Hey before knowing anything don't talk anything first of all giraffepoacher is GM Eric Hansen and other LMs that you have mentioned are also strong I agree that lance5500 is strong but not stronger than Eric
Agree, but does GM Eric Hansen play a lot?? LM Lance5500 is always active, and is playing always
Maybe, Eric plays in other account, but that's another story.
> Hey before knowing anything don't talk anything first of all giraffepoacher is GM Eric Hansen and other LMs that you have mentioned are also strong I agree that lance5500 is strong but not stronger than Eric
Agree, but does GM Eric Hansen play a lot?? LM Lance5500 is always active, and is playing always
Maybe, Eric plays in other account, but that's another story.
@CountNiwatori said in #32:
> It's like comparing tigers with lions. They have different habitats.
> Best way to compare a CM to LM is to compare their FIDE ratings (assuming the LM has one).
Great way of thinking!
> It's like comparing tigers with lions. They have different habitats.
> Best way to compare a CM to LM is to compare their FIDE ratings (assuming the LM has one).
Great way of thinking!
End of discussion)
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.